in 2002 premiered a film called s1mone, directed by Andrew Niccol and starring Al Pacino and Rachel Roberts. The argument was simple: A film director tired of having to deal with the egos and posturing of the great actresses, decide their own computer-generated, docile and perfect actress. Overwhelmed by the resounding success of this discovery acting, which for obvious reasons just given telephone interviews or via microwave from a secret study, and having obtained what he needed it, decides to end his career prestige. So as to reprogram s1mone in an interview said he agreed with almost all traditional taboos of society: bestiality, racism, and even advocacy of alcohol who appears disheveled so far has been perfect for the cameras. To the surprise of its creator, the day after the controversy interview, which theoretically should have buried the fledgling career of the actress made of bits and numbers, its popularity is more to be forgiven s1mone whatever!
Had this story been written by Aesop, would have been a perfect story to show a crude one of the burdens of stardom: It is becoming harder to know the true scope of applause. The fine line between reverence before the applause fades a special talent to be confused with praise by those who are dazzled by a history of success.
is in these moments where, who has earned fame by dint of discipline, talent, polish, smell to understand their times and especially a lot of work, you need someone beside you "pull the cord to earth" as deftly wrote the Argentine singer Fito Paez. This critical body can have three sides: those who have an emotional bonds, the one who lives to be professional and the gossip of aseptically who owns the tools and knowledge to criticize. To understand this better, imagine an opera singer and a high set by the masses, retreating to the clubhouse after three trips to the stage to a standing audience cheered him. Both he and his critics, as a couple that did not rise to applaud the crowd delirious harmless, they know that a tenor aria made a couple errors. The first type of critic will say "all right, but you should rest more." The second write some nonsense for a handful of followers who share his "impeccable handling of sarcasm," and the third wrote that there was an error (failed in a note), explain why this happened (has accepted too many contracts and is enamored with fame) and show concern that the fall of an idol may be also the art of his affections. The third critical issue is crucial both for the artist, and society. Is a professional critic. One to be heard by the singer in our example, can literally save your career.
I advance the theory that because he would not listen to critics who were approaching drums, French cuisine supremacy lost fair and square that accounted for more than a century in the Western culinary scene, and at this point is hard to deny that in the plane professional (books, ratings, prestige, awards, schools, food tourism) is Spain who is boss (something simply unthinkable just 15 years ago!), perhaps the greatest challenge facing the Iberian star is just make do with objectivity extent to which their achievements are enormous. Newspaper articles praising and 20,000 guests a year, can become a Trojan horse that brings hidden within it a powerful light that blinds from seeing that we are heading, eventually, to the cliff. Only someone who speaks with sufficient force and above all credibility, is able to make us look away from the praise, and face our mistakes.
I think that in Venezuela we are moving steadily and swiftly toward the consolidation of an important gastronomic movement that manage to enter the professional level of the continent, but shape it has played in times when the office became public characteristics of mass and prestige than before you were outside. These are the times when it is fundamentally a food critic specialist who wishes to join us notice unwelcome time away from us which is a common focus. In the coming years, if you know a budding talent with obvious potential for stardom and I will tell you gladly represent ... "Some critics will see"
Had this story been written by Aesop, would have been a perfect story to show a crude one of the burdens of stardom: It is becoming harder to know the true scope of applause. The fine line between reverence before the applause fades a special talent to be confused with praise by those who are dazzled by a history of success.
is in these moments where, who has earned fame by dint of discipline, talent, polish, smell to understand their times and especially a lot of work, you need someone beside you "pull the cord to earth" as deftly wrote the Argentine singer Fito Paez. This critical body can have three sides: those who have an emotional bonds, the one who lives to be professional and the gossip of aseptically who owns the tools and knowledge to criticize. To understand this better, imagine an opera singer and a high set by the masses, retreating to the clubhouse after three trips to the stage to a standing audience cheered him. Both he and his critics, as a couple that did not rise to applaud the crowd delirious harmless, they know that a tenor aria made a couple errors. The first type of critic will say "all right, but you should rest more." The second write some nonsense for a handful of followers who share his "impeccable handling of sarcasm," and the third wrote that there was an error (failed in a note), explain why this happened (has accepted too many contracts and is enamored with fame) and show concern that the fall of an idol may be also the art of his affections. The third critical issue is crucial both for the artist, and society. Is a professional critic. One to be heard by the singer in our example, can literally save your career.
I advance the theory that because he would not listen to critics who were approaching drums, French cuisine supremacy lost fair and square that accounted for more than a century in the Western culinary scene, and at this point is hard to deny that in the plane professional (books, ratings, prestige, awards, schools, food tourism) is Spain who is boss (something simply unthinkable just 15 years ago!), perhaps the greatest challenge facing the Iberian star is just make do with objectivity extent to which their achievements are enormous. Newspaper articles praising and 20,000 guests a year, can become a Trojan horse that brings hidden within it a powerful light that blinds from seeing that we are heading, eventually, to the cliff. Only someone who speaks with sufficient force and above all credibility, is able to make us look away from the praise, and face our mistakes.
I think that in Venezuela we are moving steadily and swiftly toward the consolidation of an important gastronomic movement that manage to enter the professional level of the continent, but shape it has played in times when the office became public characteristics of mass and prestige than before you were outside. These are the times when it is fundamentally a food critic specialist who wishes to join us notice unwelcome time away from us which is a common focus. In the coming years, if you know a budding talent with obvious potential for stardom and I will tell you gladly represent ... "Some critics will see"
0 comments:
Post a Comment